Hello developers. I would like to make my suggestion. I believe that this is a wish of many people who use programs according to the site's rules. I know about the struggle you have with users who use helps and programs incorrectly on the site, without the appropriate red marking. And that you have recently been taking measures to discourage their use. However, many people like to use programs, just like me, within the rules stipulated by the site. I would like to ask that a ranking for subscribers who use programs be created in all types of chess modality and that it appear within the game tab. Another issue concerns the leader who has the crown. With the new rules, whoever has the most points in each modality if marked as a program does not receive the crown. I understand that you want to value Humans. However, why don't you create an exclusive crown for those marked as a program? It could have another color, another symbol, etc. Many users have stopped subscribing to the site because of these things. I thank you in advance.
Ranking and Programs
Posted in
Requests to Developers
Ranking and Programs
So u mean 2 reward people for their cheating.... Im more from ban them from this site, this site is to play and not to cheat. In real life u dont get a crown for misbehaviour also. That way u encourage cheating even more here, cant be tolerated in anyway!
I agree with what you say about people not following the site's rules. However, programs are allowed on the site, as long as they are identified by a red mark. Therefore, what I am suggesting is not something that should offend. I think you should read the site's rules. I just think there should be a top ranking of programs, and a strong penalty for those who insist on using programs with unidentified humans. Many subscribers use programs and this could be beneficial for the site. Avoiding misuse, increasing the number of subscribers, as it would create competition with more rules, as monitoring and penalties would also increase, reducing tolerance. Some sites have exclusive rooms for this. This would be another option. Use is only permitted in such rooms.
Why should there be a top ranking for program players if no program player will ever lose. Programs are designed not to lose. Ur just gonna end up with a load of 1000+ fake players like yourself. You probably don’t even understand how to play the game.
2
hi all I suggested the same thing, but I haven't received a response for months. As for Zamalek, your statement is just causing trouble here. There are players here at Checker who occupy all the rooms with their name, which means that the players play with multiple PCs and therefore know the game influences. It's fair play and there's also a chance for program players! I really enjoy playing against program players, you can only learn from it. I haven't used a program since 1998, but a moderator labeled me as a program player. Due to false posts from jealous people
Out with them programmers, they the ones that occupy the rooms, can be replaced by fair players. They just here to mess up the game, and even get rewarded for it to let them in here.
I know that you are against program players. But it is stated in the Flyordie rules that you can use a program in Flyordie. In 2008, The Bochumer and Nextball fought against unfair players. And your statement that program players occupied all the rooms is not true. I don't want to write here who started it! The fact that you can't use a program in billiards or other games is also wrong.
Honestly it’s just sad how people use programs and gain nothing from it. U using a program means ur rubbish and not capable of winning. Therefore u have no skill in the game nor do u have a real rating. If ur using a program your just sad and play for the points. Also many people are gonna refusing playing a bot. It’s good that it’s not happening in billiards but chess is just a ridiculous place to cheat. Cheaters don’t deserve to win neither do they deserve having a crown. Totally pointless. I disrespect all bot players for their unfair play.
1
They won’t do it anyway, knowing that using program doesn’t require skill or human interaction, which makes it boring. But we can agree to disagree